Saturday, May 25, 2013

PNG is NOT a banana republic

                                                                                                 
If someone is asked in year 2050 to go back in time to study the history of PNG, I believe the year 2013 will be the starting point in shaping the future of the country for better or for worse.

After so many shocking news crimpling the country over the last couple of months, yet we have another one yesterday (23rd May 2013) but weird one too. This time, according to the mainstream media, the numbers of Parliamentarians in the Opposition had been reduced to only six MPs by migration of MPs joining the Government ranks - portraying the Opposition as unworthy and meaningless in our democracy government system.

One may question the loyalty of these MPs. If one cannot be loyal, then we may as well question the integrity, credibility and reputation of these MPs, as well as their underlying reasons of switching. It is very obvious that our MPs talk like men but they act like boys - preaching one thing and doing the opposite.

In fact, the year (2013), has been the year of shocking news, hitting the news headlines around the globe.  

The country has stayed awakening by very disturbing events happening around the country, over the last couple of months. The year has recorded some of the most horrific killings and rapes.  
 A woman burnt alive in Mt. Hagen followed by raping and killing of another young woman in front of her one year old baby, whom was left overnight beside her bleeding dead body.

As still not enough, there was another killing of an expatriate man in Mt. Hagen and raping of his Pilipino girlfriend. This followed by killing of a young man in Lae and raping of an expatriate academic/researcher in Madang.
                                                                                                                        
These killings and rapes have left the nation in great shock and raked in public outcry, for the government to take immediate actions before the country become a grave yard for innocent women, men and children.

As the government was trying to respond to public outcry over the violent crimes, there was more shocking news.

This time, the infamous bank robber, murder and rapist Walliam Nanu Kapris has escaped twice from the maximum prison at Bomana, outside Port Moresby. It may appear that he was deliberately let out to kill and rape more victims to continue the trend of violent crimes in the country because he was supposed to be securely locked away and guarded.   

When Kapris was first escaped last year, the exercise of recapturing him cost the State dearly in millions of public funds. Looks like the first escape didn’t teach them any lesson as the government is spending or going to spend the same amount or more to recapture the wanted criminal again.  Maybe they deliberately are doing this so that someone can benefit from this expensive exercise of recapturing him.
                                                              
While the nation was absorbed with violent crimes and news of Kapris’s second escape, there was another story crept into the mainstream media unnoticed. This time it was not about murder, rape or notorious criminals escaped from prisons but about misappropriation or theft of public funds.

According to the mainstream media in the country on May 15, 2013, a businessman from East New Britain, Eremas Wartoto was accused of misappropriating more than K61.1 million from the PNG government.
                                                                                                                     
In the next day, (May 16, 2013), the same mainstream media reported yet another fraud against the State of more than K71 million by the country’s largest Law firm, Paul Paraka lawyers. This whopping amount has been paid between 2012 and 2013, making business with the government even more attractive. But the government said they will spend another K2 million for an enquiry.

Many such enquiries have been carried out before and their findings and recommendations are yet to be tabled in parliament and implemented. But the PM has given his words to get down to the tea boys so the nation is waiting for the outcome if by this time it will be different.

The continuous theft against the State by individuals and firms is indicating that the government has a lot of money to entertain certain already well-off individuals, in the name of providing and rendering services to the State.
                                                                                                                                 
But that is not the case when it comes to providing basic goods and services in the country, which the rural people badly need.

After all of the above, the people have been wondering what might happen next.
                                          
The next event didn’t take that much long as the mainstream media, on May 23rd, 2013, reported the migration of Parliamentarians from the opposition to join the government ranks, leaving the opposition with only six MPs.   

Can anyone think of any country in the world that had seen majority of members moving from the opposition to join the government ranks, leaving behind a skeleton opposition?

They may have better excuses but the paranoid reason of serving the people better in the government is not new and in fact misleading because every MP have one thing in common and that is to serve the people whether in the government or in the opposition.  

One thing common about political leaders around the world is they do argue and disagree with each other on certain policy issues but they don’t migrate in big numbers from the opposition to the government like what has been happening in PNG. 

We may as well assume that they are switching political parties to serve their own interest. May be they are seeking immunity to protect themselves from investigations by the Task Force Team of possible or future corruption allegations. Or maybe they are seeking opportunities to personal wealth creation so that they can become rich quickly and the surplus can be used to successfully defend and seek re-election after their five-year term expires. Or maybe for some other reasons only god knows what they are.

All these are not only happening in this government. We had seen and witnessed the current trend of shocking news in previous governments led by former Prime Ministers as well.

Whatever the reasons are we have been over many years a laughing stocks for the world because of running down a natural rich country by serving our own interests first before the country and its people.

The question now asked is – are we going to be forever a laughing stock for the world or do we need to change here right now to shape a better future, which we all desire.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Unitech SRC President’s Last Chance: How Will He Prepare Students for the Sevua Report?

By: CONCERNED STUDENT

It is good to see so many Unitech students visiting this website to learn the hidden truths about Unitech saga 2013.   The responses show that a free spirit for change still exists even though the SRC is now trying to distract our attention with other activities.  Let them try.  The main focus must always remain on WHERE IS ALBERT SCHRAM?  Until that question is finally settled.

Big thankyou goes to those who kept asking questions on this blogs until our SRC President finally had to leave his hiding place and answer.  If not for you stubborn questioners,  Livingston Hosea would still be expanding his spy group.   Keep watching and report any wrongdoing here on this site SO THAT HE CANNOT COVER UP EVIL ACTIONS.

On that day when the SRC president stopped the boycott, all students learnt that Livingston Hosea will listen to us and nod his head in agreement, then turn around and do whatever he was planning to do no matter what the majority thinks.   What he says and what he does are 2 different things.   The boycott was a failure was because of the SRC president’s cowardly retreat.  For that reason we should always be careful about believing Livington Hosea’s words before we see the action.

Special thankyou goes to the law experts out there who pointed out that Contempt of Court was an excuse the SRC president was hiding behind.   The weakness in his logic was exposed here for the world to see.

Notice that Mr Hosea never really answered why he did not demand that VC Albert Schram be allowed to be present at graduation once he was on campus.    His continued mysterious silence on directly, clearly answering that main question says a lot about his true character.

But enough about the past.  The next big event in Unitech saga 2013 is the Sevua investigation.  This may be where our SRC president will shine like a bright kina coin or once again looks more like a dirty rag that evil people wiped their behinds with.

It is said that the Sevua investigation has finished collecting evidence.    The PM has already stated that this report is the final say on this controversy although that goes against the legal powers of our court system of which the Sevua investigation is not connected. Will Livingston Hosea take a stand on that?

When the Sevua report  is released, we will all see if the VC can resume where he left off.   What was he doing before?    He was making fine progress at our university in terms of fighting corruption, making sure the money is well spent, and inspiring us students to perform to our fullest potential.   Over the past 6 months, the acting bent noodles in charge of Unitech administration have failed miserably to show leadership like what Albert Schram did. They seem to suffer the same sickness as Livingston Hosea. In the coming few weeks watch carefully to see if our SRC president takes action or does nothing on these things:

1.  Will the SRC president begin preparing our student body to get ready for the tabling of the Sevua report or will he stay silent, hoping we students forget about this critical event and go off to semester break?   Will Livingston Hosea bother to find out from government sources when the Sevua report will be tabled and share that information with us or will he keep doing what the big shots tell him
to do?

2. Will the SRC president demand that Sevua report contents BE MADE PUBLIC to all students and all Papua New Guinean citizens or will he let the government keep that report secret?   Will Livingston Hosea show himself to be on the side of transparency or on the side ofhidden words and secret deals?

3. If the Sevua report is as biased as its original terms of reference were, will the SRC president demand a followup enquiry with new terms of reference that are fair to our VC or will he stay silent and help the evil side prevail?
If Livingston Hosea were a true visionary, none of the above would have to be asked.  We would all appreciate the leadership qualities of our SRC president and let him go out and lead.  Unfortunately, Mr Hosea shows a tendency to bend with any wind that blows from above. Judge for yourself the true character of Livingston Hosea as you see how he responds to the above issues.

Over to you SRC president and remember :   Our country and the world now watches your actions through the internet.