Formation of current government decribed as coup.

Election Challenged.
The August formation of the O'Neil-Namah Government has been described as a coup.

That was from lawyers representing disgraced Prime Minister Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare, as hearing proper of the Special Reference opened at the Supreme Court yesterday.

The High Court heard submissions on the issue of whether or not there was a vacancy in the office of the Prime Minister, which led to Parliament's election of Peter O'Neil as the country's Chief Executive Officer.

Queens Counsel Marshall Cook representing Sir Michael says, there was never a vacancy, and that Parliament's election of Mr. O'Neil was against the law.

Mr. Cook submitted that the vote taken by Parliament on August the second, electing Peter O'Neil as Prime Minister was unconstitutional and invalid, because Parliament has no power to declare a vacancy in the Office of the Prime Minister.

Mr. Cook submitted that even if it does have the power to declare the vacancy, the Constitution requires the vote for a new Prime Minister to take place on the next sitting day, after Parliament has been informed of the vacancy, and not as what happened in the August sitting.

He submitted that the question of whether there was a vacancy should be determined by a judge of the National Court, as stated by the Final Report of the Constitutional Planning Committee, and not Parliament.

The Queens Counsel also submitted that section 142 of the Constitution, which prescribed ways in which a Prime Minister may be removed from office to create a vacancy was also not properly followed by Parliament.

He says in any case, the Head of State, which is the Governor General has the ultimate power to remove a Prime Minister and not Parliament.

He told the court, that because of this, Sir Michael and his Government should be reinstated.

Intervening parties in support of the Referrer have also submitted, that the Grand Chief was never at any stage of unsound mind.

Mr. Cook submitted, that even if Sir Michael was in that state, the process to fully determine his unfit health, which would subsequently result in a vacancy in the office of the Prime Minister was never completed to enable the change.

Evidence before the court say, the then Acting Prime Minister Sam Abal had requested the Governor General in July to request the National Authority responsible for he registration or licensing of medical doctors to appoint two doctors to examine Sir Michael.

But that process failed to begin, when the change occurred.

The Ombudsman Commission, has provided the court with processes and procedures involved in replacing a Prime Minister under medical grounds, but have taken a stand in support of the other parties that the prescribed process was ultimately not followed.

The intervening parties representing the Parliament and the Government, will make their submissions on the issue of vacancy today, while also providing their proposed answers to the 37 questions asked in the Special Reference.

NBC News

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HIGHLANDS FRAUD F*CKS RUNNING GOVERNMENT AGENCY,,,

MARAPE & PAITA ABOUT TO SIGN AWAY PNG GOLD

AUGUSTINE MANO PNG'S PREMIER CORPORATE CROOK

PNG, VERY RICH YET STILL A VERY VERY POOR COUNTRY

James Marape's Missteps Openly Exposed at Australian Forum

BLIND LEADING THE BLIND, WHY THE PNG ECONOMY STILL SUCKS

A Call for Local Ownership and Fairness