What was Ian Kemish doing at Government House in PNG?
Mr Namah said that he was not aware that this was an occasion open to the general public.
“What were the Australians doing there? Were other diplomats invited? Who invited them? Government House, or Peter O’Neill?”
“I cannot imagine the PNG High Commissioner to Australia being invited to Government House in Canberra to a meeting between Her Excellency Quentin Bryce and an Australian politician.”
“Kemish’s presence is a breach of protocol. It also raises many questions about the relationship between him and his mate Peter O’Neill.”
“This Australian High Commissioner seems to have enormous power. He acts as though he is O’Neill’s chief adviser, telling him when Papua New Guinea should or should not have elections, why PNG should not worry about introducing a bio-metric system of voter identification or electronic voting, even though the 2012 election, as predicted, has been marked by gross electoral fraud and disenfranchisement of thousands of people.
Is he now advising his mate on which parties to go into coalition with, or whom to give ministries to?”
“And even worse than that, if the report in today’s National is accurate, he has expressed an opinion on who PNG Members of Parliament should elect as the Prime Minister, and that he is “satisfied” with the conduct of the election. That view is not the view of the majority of Papua New Guineans, especially those who were not able to vote due to their names not being on the roll or rogue conduct of electoral officials.
His view on the election is also contrary to the findings of the Commonwealth Observer Group.”
“Kemish was quoted as saying at Government House, Peter O’Neill should be the Prime Minister for the next five years. This is unbelievable, that a foreign head of mission should publicly say such a thing.”
“Kemish might be in love with O’Neill, but that should be kept private. What Kemish says publicly becomes the public policy and position of the Australian Government. I do not believe anyone in Canberra would approve of him stating publicly who should be the PNG Prime Minister.”
“If the PNG High Commissioner to Australia were to make a public statement saying he thought the ALP should elect Kevin Rudd as Leader instead of Julia Gillard, or that he hoped the Liberal Party formed the next Government, or that he preferred Malcolm Turnbull or Julie Bishop to Tony Abbott, he would be crucified. He would never do that anyway, because he is a proper diplomat.”
“Power seems to have gone to Kemish’s head. He has forgotten that he is a diplomat and subject to conventions of diplomacy and protocol.”
“Whose interest is the Australian High Commissioner serving? His own, so he can smugly claim to other Ambassadors in Port Moresby that he has more influence and inside knowledge about PNG and PNG politics than they do? O’Neill’s personal political interest?”
“One thing is sure. He is not acting in the interests of the majority of Papua New Guineans, or in the long-term interest of Australia. What he is doing could harm the good relationship between our two countries, because he is meddling in matters that are not the concern of any foreigner.”
Mr Namah concluded: “Who is running Papua New Guinea today? We are an independent sovereign nation, but we are behaving as though we are still a colony of Australia.”
“I call on the Australian Foreign Minister to apologise and to discipline the High Commissioner. He should be recalled immediately, because he has interfered with PNG’s sovereignty, by deliberately trying to influence the Election and the process of Parliament electing the next Prime Minister.”
BELDEN NAMAH
Namah you may be right but can you explain your sexually explicit bad mouthing at a casino in Sydney and how about Fugitive Tjandra whom Namah brought in to be a citizen of PNG? These are not breaches of protocol? You did not challenge the sovereignty of Australia or Indonesia? Any way good try Namah.
ReplyDeleteNamah's election was funded by Tjandra. They were both on the Falcon jet when the Indonesian fighter jets tailed the Falcon in November 2011. Belden, you kaikai kok blo Tjandra.
ReplyDeleteYou sound very convincing so give us the proof instead of repeating what everyone else have said and make it look like you were witness to the funding. You and Beldon aren't the only ones on this site so keep your sexual fantasies to yoursef.
DeleteThe Australian High Commissioner and for that matter our PNG High Comm in Australia can be invited as guests of the Vice Regal to witness the formation of a government and that's ok.
ReplyDeleteWhere has Namah got all his crazy ideas from?
I'd like our next Government to start investigating Namah for illegal logging contracts and money laundering..
He cannot be forever boasting his about his laudered millions. !!!
Namah shall have his day in Court, and that for sure is just around the corner.
ReplyDeleteHaus Karabus weitim em stap.
It's kinda hard to believe namah's allegations. Because
ReplyDelete(a) it's coming from a sore loser who has a personal interest in stopping parliment, to have more time to fish for mps.
(b) no evidence of any kind, whatsoever. No witness, photo, video, audio evidence of ian kemish being there.
Belden has to come up with big, hard throbbing evidence if he wants this story to stick.
Compare his evidence, to that of the confidential casino black and white report (circulated online), about belden's gay sex and gambling adventures in australia.
Hehehehehe... Beldan, Beldan, Beldan. Seriously you need a cheak up at the laloki clinic. Here you are again telling us some conspiracy of the person next door. My advice: keep shut until you have some Substantive Material To Share With Us. Mi les pinis long harem maus wara blong yu. You talk about protocal, but who was the lunatic who walked into a courtroom session. You even said you were in the millitary intel. Well my friend, a millitary intel man like you on the loose in society is indeed a concern as you would be more observant and direct with absolute certainty of such assumptions than a monkey curious to find whats in the barrel of a loaded shotgun.
ReplyDeleteHehehehehe... Beldan, Beldan, Beldan. Seriously you need a cheak up at the laloki clinic. Here you are again telling us some conspiracy of the person next door. My advice: keep shut until you have some Substantive Material To Share With Us. Mi les pinis long harem maus wara blong yu. You talk about protocal, but who was the lunatic who walked into a courtroom session. You even said you were in the millitary intel. Well my friend, a millitary intel man like you on the loose in society is indeed a concern as you would be more observant and direct with absolute certainty of such assumptions than a monkey curious to find whats in the barrel of a loaded shotgun.
ReplyDelete