PM SHOULD HAND HIMSELF IN
NO MORE EXCUSES FOR THE PRIME MINISTER
On Tuesday April 5, 2016, Prime Minister Peter O’Neill said: “We all know who are the real financial beneficiaries of the Paraka transactions.
“I look forward to the facts seeing the light of day on this issue.”
He now has a duty to go to the police and submit to an interview on Parakagate to provide them with these facts.
His failure to do opens the way for him to be charged with further very serious criminal offences (see below).
It insults the Office of the Prime Minister and the people of Papua New Guinea.
NO MORE LIES. NO MORE DELAYS.
Opposition Leader Don Polye voluntarily went to the police to tell them what he knows about Parakagate.
He has done his duty as a law-abiding citizen.
Every other law-abiding citizen in the country would do the same.
So should the Prime Minister.
WHAT’S SO SPECIAL ABOUT THE PRIME MINISTER?
There is nothing special about the Prime Minister.
He has no more rights than any other citizen.
He should behave like any other law-abiding citizen.
He should set an example and go the Police HQ and voluntarily give them the vital information he has about this criminal investigation.
THE PRIME MINISTER SHOULD PROTECT THE HIGH OFFICE HE HOLDS
The Office of the Prime Minister should be beyond reproach, both at home and abroad.
Mr O’Neill has prostituted the Office of the Prime Minister.
He has dragged its reputation and dignity through the mud.
He has compromised its independence.
Mr O’Neill’s actions are shaming the nation of Papua New Guinea as the foreign media uncovers his corruption.
Now his admission that he knows who benefitted from Parakagate, and other facts relating to it, threatens to bring the Office of the Prime Minister even lower.
CRIMINAL OFFENCES BY THE PRIME MINISTER
Mr O’Neill’s admission shows that the Office of the Prime Minister is being used to conceal a crime, and to conceal evidence of a crime.
Mr O’Neill’s knowledge of evidence of a crime, and his refusal to reveal that evidence to police, opens him to charges under the Criminal Code of Papua New Guinea, including conspiracy to defeat justice, obstruction of justice, attempting to pervert justice, compounding a crime and being an accessory to a crime.
On Tuesday April 5, 2016, Prime Minister Peter O’Neill said: “We all know who are the real financial beneficiaries of the Paraka transactions.
“I look forward to the facts seeing the light of day on this issue.”
He now has a duty to go to the police and submit to an interview on Parakagate to provide them with these facts.
His failure to do opens the way for him to be charged with further very serious criminal offences (see below).
It insults the Office of the Prime Minister and the people of Papua New Guinea.
NO MORE LIES. NO MORE DELAYS.
Opposition Leader Don Polye voluntarily went to the police to tell them what he knows about Parakagate.
He has done his duty as a law-abiding citizen.
Every other law-abiding citizen in the country would do the same.
So should the Prime Minister.
WHAT’S SO SPECIAL ABOUT THE PRIME MINISTER?
There is nothing special about the Prime Minister.
He has no more rights than any other citizen.
He should behave like any other law-abiding citizen.
He should set an example and go the Police HQ and voluntarily give them the vital information he has about this criminal investigation.
THE PRIME MINISTER SHOULD PROTECT THE HIGH OFFICE HE HOLDS
The Office of the Prime Minister should be beyond reproach, both at home and abroad.
Mr O’Neill has prostituted the Office of the Prime Minister.
He has dragged its reputation and dignity through the mud.
He has compromised its independence.
Mr O’Neill’s actions are shaming the nation of Papua New Guinea as the foreign media uncovers his corruption.
Now his admission that he knows who benefitted from Parakagate, and other facts relating to it, threatens to bring the Office of the Prime Minister even lower.
CRIMINAL OFFENCES BY THE PRIME MINISTER
Mr O’Neill’s admission shows that the Office of the Prime Minister is being used to conceal a crime, and to conceal evidence of a crime.
Mr O’Neill’s knowledge of evidence of a crime, and his refusal to reveal that evidence to police, opens him to charges under the Criminal Code of Papua New Guinea, including conspiracy to defeat justice, obstruction of justice, attempting to pervert justice, compounding a crime and being an accessory to a crime.