PNGBLOGS

Dionisia Tabureguci Telikom PNG, snipped and re-shaped by a market forced to open to new competition not too long ago, is gearing itself to take on Papua New Guinea’s emerging broadband era. The fully state-owned telecommunications company falls in the portfolio of the Independent Public Business Corporation (IPBC), an entity set up in 2002 to independently hold the majority of state-owned commercial assets and to improve their commercial performance. Last month, IPBC managing director Glenn Blake met with Telikom PNG management and was told the telco had begun to formulate corporate strategies to capitalise on government initiatives flowing from its ICT policy and plans for a national broadband network. “It is important for Telikom, the country’s premier integrated telecommunications company, to continue to restructure and grow its business to provide improved services to the corporate sector and the general public,” Blake said. The government, he added, will support initiatives by T

Dionisia Tabureguci Telikom PNG, snipped and re-shaped by a market forced to open to new competition not too long ago, is gearing itself to take on Papua New Guinea’s emerging broadband era. The fully state-owned telecommunications company falls in the portfolio of the Independent Public Business Corporation (IPBC), an entity set up in 2002 to independently hold the majority of state-owned commercial assets and to improve their commercial performance. Last month, IPBC managing director Glenn Blake met with Telikom PNG management and was told the telco had begun to formulate corporate strategies to capitalise on government initiatives flowing from its ICT policy and plans for a national broadband network. “It is important for Telikom, the country’s premier integrated telecommunications company, to continue to restructure and grow its business to provide improved services to the corporate sector and the general public,” Blake said. The government, he added, will support initiatives b

One Country My dear Dr. Maima your article is interesting. But that is all. Both you and Peter Donigi are irresponsible and destructive in your creation of false hopes for our people. Your propositions are not new. They have been asserted, and can be asserted and debated long and hard into the night, as happened in the past. At the end of the day, we have to do what is right and what is responsible for the nation State to survive and prosper. We cannot assert ourselves and our rights by our Constitution, at the same time, deny nationhood and the fecundity of life of a nation perpetuated by the Constitution. We either exist as a nation or we don't. If we exist as a nation by virtue of our Constitution, then that Constitution reserves the right of ownership of the natural resources to us as a nation, not a single group. The resources you speak of belong to the State, by the very Constitution that created the nation State. That is, the resources belong not just to one group of landown

One Country My dear Dr. Maima your article is interesting. But that is all. Both you and Peter Donigi are irresponsible and destructive in your creation of false hopes for our people. Your propositions are not new. They have been asserted, and can be asserted and debated long and hard into the night, as happened in the past. At the end of the day, we have to do what is right and what is responsible for the nation State to survive and prosper. We cannot assert ourselves and our rights by our Constitution, at the same time, deny nationhood and the fecundity of life of a nation perpetuated by the Constitution. We either exist as a nation or we don't. If we exist as a nation by virtue of our Constitution, then that Constitution reserves the right of ownership of the natural resources to us as a nation, not a single group. The resources you speak of belong to the State, by the very Constitution that created the nation State. That is, the resources belong not just to one group of land

John Fowke Observer: I accept all you say in your posted comment on Sunday. However as to, quote-"Mr Fowke, you may say that we need to get more confidence and guts to use our real names. If you have that comment, please spread it across all the internet as a general internet problem, not acting as if its a PNG problem t'sol".- This is not an argument, its an admission. The fact that the internet has provided an easy, ready-to-hand and broadly uncritical, undisciplined canvas for all and sundry to paint their pictures upon doesn't provide an excuse for the use of nom-de-plumes or nicknames as signatures except in hegemonic or dictatorial nations. China or Burma, for instance.On the other hand, I guess its fashionable to do this- and Im not a fashion-person. I'll admit. Fashions are insubstantial things - and in this case, almost always an affectation rather than a necessity. PNG, whilst it does manifest some aspects of hegemonic government, remains staunchly a

John Fowke Observer: I accept all you say in your posted comment on Sunday. However as to, quote-"Mr Fowke, you may say that we need to get more confidence and guts to use our real names. If you have that comment, please spread it across all the internet as a general internet problem, not acting as if its a PNG problem t'sol".- This is not an argument, its an admission. The fact that the internet has provided an easy, ready-to-hand and broadly uncritical, undisciplined canvas for all and sundry to paint their pictures upon doesn't provide an excuse for the use of nom-de-plumes or nicknames as signatures except in hegemonic or dictatorial nations. China or Burma, for instance.On the other hand, I guess its fashionable to do this- and Im not a fashion-person. I'll admit. Fashions are insubstantial things - and in this case, almost always an affectation rather than a necessity. PNG, whilst it does manifest some aspects of hegemonic government, remains staunchl

RUSSELL HANGAT & CLARA MOIMOI The Papua New Guinea Development Strategic Plan (PNGDSP) 2010-2030 maps out a path to transform PNG into a middle income country. It answers the questions of “where is PNG now?”, “where do we want it to be in 2030?” and “how will PNG get there?”. This is the first time PNG has taken a long term focus on development planning and is the first time planning has been fully home grown with donors shut out of the formulation of the PNGDSP. It is the first time we see clearly articulated targets – targets that set middle income standards, that are achievable, and that can be monitored. Importantly it aims to transform poverty corridors into economic corridors with the 10 corridors planned for development covering some of the poorest areas of PNG. The PNGDSP will be implemented through four 5-year medium term development plans (MTDPs) – the first of which is the MTDP 2011-2015 . Key to the MTDP is the planning of resource allocation for achieving