Tourism in Papua New Guinea is in trouble

PETER BARTER

Few people that have ever visited PNG doubt the tremendous tourism potential PNG has to offer so many varied interests wether it be trekking, cultural, art, orchids, birding, diving, WW2 or just relaxing in unspoilt tropical splendour.
Up until the turn of the century there were positive signs that tourism would continue to prosper providing PNG with a renewable resource that was sustainable. More recently the visitor arrival figures issued by the Tourism Promotion Authority indicated that PNG had one of the fastest growing tourist industries in the South Pacific region and constant positive media reports indicated a healthy growth.
Nothing could have been further from the truth, the tourism industry in PNG generally has declined by more than 50 per cent over the past few years. I refer to “bonafide” tourists, not visitor arrivals which in real terms include all types of visitors to PNG.
No one disputes there are more people arriving in PNG, the reality is most are not tourists, instead they are people visiting PNG for other purposes in most cases work related many of whom abuse the ‘tourist visa’ system which help to distort the real situation of the tourist industry.
Historically much the growth of the tourist industry is directly related to overseas tour operators. It is through these partnership arrangements that have been concluded between local operators in PNG and these overseas operators who for the want of a special word have ‘packaged’ tours or parts of their tours to visit PNG.
These overseas operators are experts in their respective markets, they produce the superb tourist brochures that highlight reasons for visiting a particular destination. In more recent years they have used their websites and internet to expose their destinations and tours most of whom concentrate on their specific interests, as an example diving, trekking, birding and they know how to market their tours.
The end result is the tourists contracts to purchase the product that is described in their brochures and this has a direct impact on bonafide tourists who visit PNG.
The number of operators featuring tours to PNG from North America, Europe, UK, Japan, Australia would have been in the hundreds, supported by the various airlines. The exposure PNG received at this time resulted in the industries growth.
This coupled with other marketing by individual operators, agents, airlines (not least Air Niugni) and hotels including the attendances at tourist shows placed PNG in the right direction to expand the tourism industry.
In most cases a personal relationship exists between tour operators overseas and their partner operator in PNG, the underlying bond is a trust, confidence in each other knowing that when a group of a client is booked he, she or the group will receive what has been contracted to the local operator. Without this trust, many overseas tour operators will not entrust their clients in fear that they would be liable if something goes wrong.
Like integrity, it takes time to be established and generally speaking overseas operators have very few trusted relationships in PNG with their local providers.
To make matters worse, operators in PNG are not required to be licensed, it is possible simply by saying you are an operator, printing a letterhead saying you are an operator and regretfully this has happed on a number of occasions resulting in some very serious problems.
The decline began with circumstances beyond our control, fuel price increases, SARS, terrorism a general change in which PNG expected a continuation of the industry to grow without the need to retain the personal contact with the operators. Many of whom also suffered from the same effects and most recently the world wide economic situation and continuation of problems in the middle east that have frightened tourists, specially Americans from travelling internationally and to lesser known destinations..
While Air Niugini cannot be blamed for the reduction in tourism, the unreliability of schedules, cancelled and disrupted flights have not been helpful over the past couple of years.
Tourists from developed countries have become increasingly aware of the ease to sue and Tour Operators are frequently targeted for not providing the services described in their brochures which in turn has forced tour operators sell destinations that are better known for their reliability and safety.
Another recent obstacle to developing tourism is the withdrawal of commuter air services that previously linked the Highlands with the coast and islands.
A tourist visiting PNG wanting to see each of the geographic regions is forced to fly back to Port Moresby and connect with flights into the next geographic region, this not only wastes time, but also substantially increased the airfares making PNG more expensive to visit and subsequently more difficult to sell.
The law and order situation does not help. We have failed to handle this situation well in PNG. In Fiji despite three military coups their industry has survived because the industry went into ‘damage control’ by a collective approach with the Fiji Visitors Bureau and the Industry association.
While we must recognise some areas in PNG are more dangerous than others, it is the perception that has resulted through the adverse Travellers Alerts produced by Australia, USA, Japan and European governments warning their citizens of the dangers that exist in PNG without in many cases specifically identifying the areas of danger.

Comments

  1. Thank you Sir Peter, for a good insight into the troubles we face in tourism.

    I suppose the two incidents at Jacksons, in rapid succession, would have scared off anyone who was looking at a PNG brochure. With communications being what they are today, it would have been around the world in seconds.

    As a resident and fairly frequent flyer, I fing Jacksons a trial of an airport. I have not been there since the shootings, but it sounds as though there will be more screening points.

    Is the Tourism Promotion Authority up to the task, or are the conditions you describe unfixable by it.

    You have been a leading light in tourism, and PNG and Madang in particular owes you a huge debt.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am always astonished at how Sir Peter rails against local operators when his own company has accumulated long lists of complaints from dissatisfied customers who do not receive what they were promised from his MTS brochures

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hear hear. He browbeats his workers, gouges tourists and clients alike, and generally makes visitors' stay in his hotel as unpleasant as possible---from terrible food to exorbitant prices. We read he now wants to eliminate the flying foxes from Madang?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ken Fairweather with Peter Barter are both old Colonial Farts who is using this stunt in Parliament to hood-wink the people of Papua New Guinea. Not only is Mr "Feathers" is an astute businessman but a crafty & cunning politician who is a master at sending a dummy to confuse our people.

    Trukai Industries, Australia's leading exporter of rice to Papua New Guinea for more than 60 years owns more than 30% of Fairweathers company, Kutubu Transport and they are making a killing in our country. I bet you, not many Papua New Guineans know this information....????

    Furthermore, don't forget folks that a decade ago we had another "Knight in White Armor" called Karl Kitchen "Grase Ball" Stack (remember him) who gelled his black hair and screwed up our forests which are still in a terrible mess today. What happened to this so-called "White Savior" of West Sepik (Sandaun)????? Well, as we all know, one grey and dark morning he ripped up his PNG passport and regained his Australian passport. He crept out of PNG territory like a thief in the night & the public only knew about his hate for PNG when John Kaputin, former Foreign Affairs Minister blew his cover to the public and described Stack as a "deserter & White con artist" for deceiving Papua New Guinea for so long. As soon as Stack touched foot in Australia he didn't waste time in accusing us Papua New Guineans as "bush kanaka's" that the white men can't civilize!

    So, I have a lot of mistrust in some of these Colonial hangovers who seek public adoration & glorification when really they are devious and calculating bunch of bigots in our country only here to "Feather" their retirement nests back in their country of origin.

    Sometimes when people like Peter Barter & Ken Fairweather push their agenda in the media, always take a closer look into the shadow & investigate what their real intentions are for being in our beautiful country. Peter Barter is feathering his next with Communist China and supports this stupid idea to dump tailings from the Basamuk Nickle Mine into our ocean because they are paying Millions in US Dollars to bunk up in the Madang Resort. Where is Barter's credibility and ethics? He can't say one thing like cradling a sick Madang baby in one arm and use the other to get under the table payment from the Chinese....,

    Mangi Lae
    PNG Patriot

    ReplyDelete
  5. Peter Barter is indeed a con artist.

    He got the government to pay him an outrageous sum of money to host John Howard a few years back. It was in the millions of kina for a little over one night's service.

    Peter Barter is one of the ones who many years ago strongly lobbied to devalue the kina. He said that it cost too much money for tourists to visit PNG. Once the kina was devalued this old con artist went and started charging tourists in US dollars so that he could make the most money possible from them.

    This is also the same Peter Barter who promoted the smelly tuna cannery outside of Madang which makes it hard sometimes to figure out why Peter Barter worries about tourists at all. Who pays big bucks to smell the horrible stench of fish in the night air covering all of Madang?

    Peter Barter goes up in his personal little helicopter to remote places to do good but have you noticed that just by chance there is always someone in these remote areas with a camera who can take pictures of Barter's good deeds?

    The list goes on and on.

    Peter Barter came to PNG to do good and he has done very well indeed off the backs of my people. No one should let him continue with this charade.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please free to leave comments.

Popular posts from this blog

HIGHLANDS FRAUD F*CKS RUNNING GOVERNMENT AGENCY,,,

AUGUSTINE MANO PNG'S PREMIER CORPORATE CROOK

PNG, VERY RICH YET STILL A VERY VERY POOR COUNTRY

BLIND LEADING THE BLIND, WHY THE PNG ECONOMY STILL SUCKS

James Marape's Missteps Openly Exposed at Australian Forum

MARAPE & PAITA ABOUT TO SIGN AWAY PNG GOLD

A Call for Local Ownership and Fairness