THE ILLEGAL REIGN OF THE O’NEILL NAMAH REGIME AND 2012 ELECTION DEFERRAL


It is as clear as day that the "govt" of Peter O'Neill and Belden Namah has been illegal since day 1, 2nd of August 2011. When one considers and accepts this as a fact, then one can begin to objectively view each and every decision they have made to date. Ever since that fateful day, most, if not all of their decisions made have been aimed at one thing only and that is to legitimise their hold on power.

 They knew GC Somare, as the legally mandated PM had every right under the constitution to remove them from office. So they went about changing laws, including the constitution to remove him from office, and disqualify him from ever becoming PM again. When they realised that even that was not enough to keep them in power and the Supreme Court was going to find them guilty of breaching the constitution to usurp power, they turned their attention on the courts and the judges.

 The CJ, as the head of the Judiciary, faced the brunt of their desperation. When they found that mere allegations cooked up by three tribesmen of O'Neill could not (and did not) stand up in court, they went about looking for some "dirt" they could pin on the CJ, and came up with the Administrative matter involving the estate of the late Justice Timothy Hinchcliffe.

When all of their attempts at smearing the name of the CJ failed, they took the unprecedented step of enacting a legislation to allow them to directly control judges. Now that they realised that they could not infiltrate, corrupt or control the Judiciary and that their sins would catch up to them when the Supreme Court does hand down the decision that their regime was illegal all along, they have decided to resort to the deferral of elections.

O’Neill as PM has just announced that parliament will continue to sit over the coming weeks. I wonder what it is that is so important/urgent that parliament has to continue sitting? Is it another fear that the SC will reinstate the govt of GC Somare as a caretaker govt leading into the polls? Is this the reason why when they failed to defer elections by six months due to public outcry, they have now decided to bargain with the EC to have a 3 week deferral to 18th May?

 I propose this: that if the SC does rule against this illegitimate govt and come April 27 when the writs are issued, they would become ordinary citizens and cannot challenge such a decision in Parlt. The SC decision would stand. However, if the issue of writs were deferred and they were still MPs and still attending parlt sittings, they could counter the SC decision by enacting yet another “illegal” law to continue remaining in power.

That, to me is the REAL REASON for wanting to defer issue of writs and continue having parlt sittings when they should have risen by now and be in their respective electorates preparing for their campaign and elections. Just my theory and I hope I am wrong but only time will tell.


VINCENT MOSES

Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 12, 2012 at 11:09 PM

    SPOT ON. And if May 18. 2012 stands for the Issue of Writs, I pray God Almighty will give wisdom to the SC Bench to hand down its ruling a week or so before the 18th so that the criminals in the O'Namah regime wont have sufficient time to retaliate using the Parliament.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousApril 12, 2012 at 11:21 PM

    Need not worrying. If May 18 stands and Supreme Courts rules in favor of GC Somare, our friend Luther Wenge will still forbid Parlt again. Otherwise, the SC will this time give its ruling with additional Orders such as preventing or warning Parliament through the Sinasina Speaker from acting contemptously.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousApril 13, 2012 at 3:16 PM

    haha...how long has it taken us to realize this? i thought everyone else went nuts when o'neil forcefully first took office...what now?

    ReplyDelete
  4. skidApril 14, 2012 at 3:09 PM

    i supportd o'namah wen they came 2 power illegaly, they gave out sweets and lollies.. now what? they are fuckin us where it really hurts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousApril 15, 2012 at 6:34 AM

    The country suffered too long at the hands of Somare and may God have mercy on this nation not to let somare in power again. What benefits will somare bring to this nation. Fact:1.somare spent millions overseas on his health while his people where dying over drug shortages to name a few. 2.somare supporters and family were part of this millions spent on hotel bills, allowances,etc, while visiting somare. Why,why should he be returned, he is of no value anymore to this rich nation. All his policies where entirely to his personal family gain. The change was for the better and the nation is witnessing how rich it is, but a very few people still want the thief somare back and for what? So they can go to the polls with money to buy votes to return them to power to steal,steal and steal. Forget somare and support change for the future.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousApril 16, 2012 at 12:31 AM

    At least he didn't bent the laws of this land like you power hungry cunts!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please free to leave comments.

Popular posts from this blog

HIGHLANDS FRAUD F*CKS RUNNING GOVERNMENT AGENCY,,,

Image
A Fraudster and unqualified person has been shortlisted for NEC submission for the position of CEPA Managing Director. The candidate in question is Jude Tukulyia. His academic credentials are subject to scrutiny. Further investigation is required to verify the authenticity and legitimacy of his qualifications, particularly the reported diploma in accounting, Bachelor of Laws, MBA from Divine Word and UPNG respectively. It is very suspicious and unprofessional  when the Minister for Environment Conservation and Climate Change, Hon Simo Kilepa, wrote to UPNG Vice Chancellor asking to confirm Jude’s questioned education qualifications. This very due diligence work is the core responsibility of the Public Service Commission and Department of Personnel Management. What authority does the portfolio minister have to write to the Universities? Dumbfounding indeed if one asks. Ulterior motives written all over the letter. This amounts to  Questionable Academic Qualifications of Mr Tukulyia.    
Read more

AUGUSTINE MANO PNG'S PREMIER CORPORATE CROOK

Image
by  MICHAEL J. PASSINGAN In a significant setback for Mineral Resources Development Corporation (MRDC), the Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea has dismissed the company's appeal to stop criminal investigations into its dealings with landowner funds held in the Pacific Balance Fund (PBF). The court ruled that MRDC's appeal was an "abuse of process" and ordered the company to pay costs of the proceedings. MRDC, a unit holder in PBF, had taken legal action against the National Court's decision to dismiss its case, arguing that the court had no jurisdiction to hear the matter. However, the Supreme Court disagreed and held that MRDC's appeal was nothing more than an attempt to interfere with the police's criminal investigative process. The court found that MRDC had no authority to conducted its own investigation into the activities of the Melanesian Trustee Services Limited (MTSL), the fund manager of PBF, and that its actions were in violation of the Trust Deed
Read more

PNG, VERY RICH YET STILL A VERY VERY POOR COUNTRY

Image
by GARY MONDULAME Papua New Guinea (PNG), a nation blessed with abundant natural resources, continues to grapple with economic challenges that belie its potential wealth. The nation's economic narrative is a paradox—rich in resources yet burdened by poverty. The explanation for this paradox lies not only in economic mismanagement but also in deep-seated corruption that has permeated the political landscape since independence in 1975. Following its independence from Australia, PNG was entrusted to leaders who lacked a vision for a holistic national development. This absence of foresight is evident from the lack of long-term development plans that could have distributed the country’s wealth fairly across all regions and communities. Successive governments failed to establish foundational strategies such as building satellite townships or creating robust rural housing schemes. Instead, they resorted to short-term, reactive measures that did not foster sustainable growth. The nascent l
Read more

BLIND LEADING THE BLIND, WHY THE PNG ECONOMY STILL SUCKS

Image
Elizabeth Genia, Acting Governor Bank of PNG (BPNG) by MICHAEL JOSEPH PASSINGAN The economy of Papua New Guinea (PNG) is at a crucial juncture. Despite some signs of recovery, the country faces several structural challenges that continue to impede its economic progress. The March 2024 Monetary Policy Statement from the Bank of Papua New Guinea sheds light on these issues, providing a comprehensive overview of the economic landscape and the policy responses being implemented to navigate through these turbulent times. In 2023, PNG's economy grew by a modest 1.4%, a significant slowdown from the 5.2% growth witnessed in 2022. This tepid growth is largely attributed to delays in major projects and ongoing economic issues that have not been fully resolved. The anticipated growth for 2024 is around 3.0%, buoyed by the resumption of production at the Porgera gold mine. While this marks an improvement, it remains subdued compared to the potential of this resource-rich nation. One of the mo
Read more

James Marape's Missteps Openly Exposed at Australian Forum

Image
by  MICHAEL J. PASSINGAN  In a recent event that highlighted the complexities of international diplomacy and governance, Papua New Guinea's Prime Minister, James Marape, faced a challenging situation during his appearance at the Lowy Institute in Sydney, Australia. The Lowy Institute, known for its role as an independent think tank focusing on international policy, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, provided a platform for a candid assessment of Marape's governance. Following his formal address, Marape engaged in a dialogue with Dr. Michael Fullilove AM, the Executive Director of the Institute. Dr. Fullilove, a respected figure in public and international policy, scrutinized Marape's past promises and statements, contrasting them with the current state of affairs in Papua New Guinea (PNG). The discussion took a critical turn as Dr. Fullilove revisited Marape's 2019 speech at the same venue, where Marape had outlined his vision for PNG in a speech titled “A New Boo
Read more

MARAPE & PAITA ABOUT TO SIGN AWAY PNG GOLD

Image
By: Andrew Arthur Prime Minister Hon. James Marape and his planning minister Reinbo Paita are the parties behind the theft of all Papua New Guinea’s gold for the next 100 years! They have given approval for the STATE of Papua New Guinea to sign away all gold rights to an Australian paper company in Refinery Holdings PTE LTD. First, they have done the deal with a paper company even before there is a LAW that says they have the right to do the deal. We see how the real manipulation works out. Marape and Paita now need to get the law passed by Parliament. The law is before the Parliament to set up Papua New Guinea’s first National Gold Corporation. The National Gold Corporation Bill first surfaced in 2012 but successive Government of Sir Michael Somare and Hon. Peter O’Neill, in their wisdom, had refused to pass this Bill as there have been some sinister motives and constitutional issues associated with the Bill. The new bill will allow Refinery Holdings LTD PTE to own 70% of the National
Read more

A Call for Local Ownership and Fairness

Image
by JUSTIN PARKER In recent discussions surrounding the establishment of a gold refinery in Papua New Guinea (PNG), concerns have been raised regarding various aspects of the proposed project. Spearheaded by foreign investors, the initiative has sparked debates over ownership, exclusivity, tax concessions, underwriting, management rights, control over currency, legal protections, and historical failures. These concerns, if unaddressed, could potentially undermine the interests of PNG and its people, particularly the hardworking alluvial miners who form the backbone of the nation's mining sector. At the heart of the issue lies the question of ownership. The proposed ownership structure, favoring foreign investors with a substantial 70% stake, raises eyebrows, especially considering PNG's past experiences with failed ventures like seabed mining. Instead of ceding majority control to foreign entities, many argue that PNG should assert full ownership over the refinery. With the coun
Read more