DIRECTOR OF FRAUD FORMALLY CHARGED

by  BRYAN KRAMER
 

Director of National Fraud & Anti-corruption Directorate Mathew Damaru was formally charged by Police under Section 197 of Criminal Code for allegedly making a false declaration and statement.
The provision is in the following terms;

"(1) A person who, on any occasion on which he is permitted or required by law to make a statement or declaration before a person authorized by law to permit it to be made before him, makes a statement or declaration before that person that is to his knowledge false in a material particular is guilty of a misdemeanour."

"Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years."
"(2) A person cannot be convicted of an offence against Subsection (1) on the uncorroborated testimony of one witness."

The charges relate to Contempt of Court proceedings filed against the Commissioner of Police Gary Baki by Damaru and his Deputy Director Timothy Gitua. Both Damaru and Gitua filed the proceedings alleging Baki interfered with or failed to adhere to effecting the warrant issued by the District Court to effect the arrest of the Secretary of Treasury Dairi Vele when Baki allegedly consented to Vele's lawyer's application to stay his arrest.

Baki is claiming the sworn affidavit by Damaru in support of the Contempt of Court proceedings against him was false. In that Baki never issued instructions consenting to stay the warrant against Vele.
Two weeks earlier Baki issued instructions to the Officer-In-Charge of Special Police Internal Investigation Team Inspector Jacob Ivaroa, a team set up under Baki's authority to charge Damaru, Gitua and their lawyer McRonald Nale for allegedly committing perjury.

Perjury is a criminal offence under Section 121(2) of the Criminal Code. The provision (section) states that perjury is a person who in any judicial (court) proceeding, or for the purpose of instituting any judicial proceedings, knowingly gives false testimony concerning any matter that is material to any question then depending in the proceedings or intended to be raised in the proceedings, is guilty of the crime of perjury.
On 1st October 2015 Inspector Ivarora applied for the warrants of arrest before the District Court. This is because the law states no person shall be charged for perjury without first obtaining a warrant (approved order from the Court to carryout an arrest).

However Senior Magistrate Cosmar Bidar refused to hear the application and adjourned it back to the Court Registry. Bidar raised the point that the issues relate to the charges that are in relation to the Contempt of Court proceedings against the Police Commissioner that is currently before the National Court and the warrant of arrest against Secretary of Treasury Dairi Vele which is currently before the District Court, both matters are still pending in court.

Bidar ruled it was appropriate Vele’s application to dismiss that warrant of arrest against him is dealt with first before the application against Damaru, Gitua and Nale is heard.
Without a arrest warrant, Damaru, Gitua and Nale could not be lawfully charged.

It seems the Commissioner hell bent on securing Damaru's arrest has now gone ahead and ordered he be charged under a separate provision under the Criminal Code, Section 197 that does not require a warrant but only corroborated testimony (supporting evidence) of more than one witness.

I'ts my view Damaru would have sufficient grounds to file for Judicial Review, moving an urgent application to stay his arrest for an abuse of process. Commissioner has already initiated the process to bring charges against Damaru for perjury, a similar charge that raises the same issues and facts. The Court made a clear ruling the matters raised are currently before the Court rather than accept and respecting the ruling Commissioner has seen fit to bring further charges raising the same issues.

Which also can be construed as amounting to contempt of court by deliberately and intentionally interfering with the administration of justice.

The question now arises what's the rush in arresting Director of Fraud? It gives the impression his arrest is a ploy to give reason to suspend him, strategically removing him from the cases involving the Prime Minister.
Right now Damaru and Gitua's cases against the Prime Minister are gaining traction they have successfully fought off every effort by the Prime Minister and Commissioner of Police to have them removed.

The Supreme Court has set a date in early November to hear their application to remove the stay preventing the Prime Minister's arrest. Since that ruling the Minister of Finance James Marape with the support of the Prime Minister, Paraka Lawyers and Commissioner of Police and Attorney General are now seeking to remove the two judges that ruled in favor of Fraud. Furthermore the Commissioner has now moved to effect their arrest. It's important to note these events are giving rise to a growing public interest and there is a real concern and risk the public may just decide to way in on the issue by exercising their right to stage public protest.

Damaru has just been released on K500 police bail.

Popular posts from this blog

HIGHLANDS FRAUD F*CKS RUNNING GOVERNMENT AGENCY,,,

Image
A Fraudster and unqualified person has been shortlisted for NEC submission for the position of CEPA Managing Director. The candidate in question is Jude Tukulyia. His academic credentials are subject to scrutiny. Further investigation is required to verify the authenticity and legitimacy of his qualifications, particularly the reported diploma in accounting, Bachelor of Laws, MBA from Divine Word and UPNG respectively. It is very suspicious and unprofessional  when the Minister for Environment Conservation and Climate Change, Hon Simo Kilepa, wrote to UPNG Vice Chancellor asking to confirm Jude’s questioned education qualifications. This very due diligence work is the core responsibility of the Public Service Commission and Department of Personnel Management. What authority does the portfolio minister have to write to the Universities? Dumbfounding indeed if one asks. Ulterior motives written all over the letter. This amounts to  Questionable Academic Qualifications of Mr Tukulyia.    
Read more

AUGUSTINE MANO PNG'S PREMIER CORPORATE CROOK

Image
by  MICHAEL J. PASSINGAN In a significant setback for Mineral Resources Development Corporation (MRDC), the Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea has dismissed the company's appeal to stop criminal investigations into its dealings with landowner funds held in the Pacific Balance Fund (PBF). The court ruled that MRDC's appeal was an "abuse of process" and ordered the company to pay costs of the proceedings. MRDC, a unit holder in PBF, had taken legal action against the National Court's decision to dismiss its case, arguing that the court had no jurisdiction to hear the matter. However, the Supreme Court disagreed and held that MRDC's appeal was nothing more than an attempt to interfere with the police's criminal investigative process. The court found that MRDC had no authority to conducted its own investigation into the activities of the Melanesian Trustee Services Limited (MTSL), the fund manager of PBF, and that its actions were in violation of the Trust Deed
Read more

PNG, VERY RICH YET STILL A VERY VERY POOR COUNTRY

Image
by GARY MONDULAME Papua New Guinea (PNG), a nation blessed with abundant natural resources, continues to grapple with economic challenges that belie its potential wealth. The nation's economic narrative is a paradox—rich in resources yet burdened by poverty. The explanation for this paradox lies not only in economic mismanagement but also in deep-seated corruption that has permeated the political landscape since independence in 1975. Following its independence from Australia, PNG was entrusted to leaders who lacked a vision for a holistic national development. This absence of foresight is evident from the lack of long-term development plans that could have distributed the country’s wealth fairly across all regions and communities. Successive governments failed to establish foundational strategies such as building satellite townships or creating robust rural housing schemes. Instead, they resorted to short-term, reactive measures that did not foster sustainable growth. The nascent l
Read more

BLIND LEADING THE BLIND, WHY THE PNG ECONOMY STILL SUCKS

Image
Elizabeth Genia, Acting Governor Bank of PNG (BPNG) by MICHAEL JOSEPH PASSINGAN The economy of Papua New Guinea (PNG) is at a crucial juncture. Despite some signs of recovery, the country faces several structural challenges that continue to impede its economic progress. The March 2024 Monetary Policy Statement from the Bank of Papua New Guinea sheds light on these issues, providing a comprehensive overview of the economic landscape and the policy responses being implemented to navigate through these turbulent times. In 2023, PNG's economy grew by a modest 1.4%, a significant slowdown from the 5.2% growth witnessed in 2022. This tepid growth is largely attributed to delays in major projects and ongoing economic issues that have not been fully resolved. The anticipated growth for 2024 is around 3.0%, buoyed by the resumption of production at the Porgera gold mine. While this marks an improvement, it remains subdued compared to the potential of this resource-rich nation. One of the mo
Read more

James Marape's Missteps Openly Exposed at Australian Forum

Image
by  MICHAEL J. PASSINGAN  In a recent event that highlighted the complexities of international diplomacy and governance, Papua New Guinea's Prime Minister, James Marape, faced a challenging situation during his appearance at the Lowy Institute in Sydney, Australia. The Lowy Institute, known for its role as an independent think tank focusing on international policy, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, provided a platform for a candid assessment of Marape's governance. Following his formal address, Marape engaged in a dialogue with Dr. Michael Fullilove AM, the Executive Director of the Institute. Dr. Fullilove, a respected figure in public and international policy, scrutinized Marape's past promises and statements, contrasting them with the current state of affairs in Papua New Guinea (PNG). The discussion took a critical turn as Dr. Fullilove revisited Marape's 2019 speech at the same venue, where Marape had outlined his vision for PNG in a speech titled “A New Boo
Read more

MARAPE & PAITA ABOUT TO SIGN AWAY PNG GOLD

Image
By: Andrew Arthur Prime Minister Hon. James Marape and his planning minister Reinbo Paita are the parties behind the theft of all Papua New Guinea’s gold for the next 100 years! They have given approval for the STATE of Papua New Guinea to sign away all gold rights to an Australian paper company in Refinery Holdings PTE LTD. First, they have done the deal with a paper company even before there is a LAW that says they have the right to do the deal. We see how the real manipulation works out. Marape and Paita now need to get the law passed by Parliament. The law is before the Parliament to set up Papua New Guinea’s first National Gold Corporation. The National Gold Corporation Bill first surfaced in 2012 but successive Government of Sir Michael Somare and Hon. Peter O’Neill, in their wisdom, had refused to pass this Bill as there have been some sinister motives and constitutional issues associated with the Bill. The new bill will allow Refinery Holdings LTD PTE to own 70% of the National
Read more

A Call for Local Ownership and Fairness

Image
by JUSTIN PARKER In recent discussions surrounding the establishment of a gold refinery in Papua New Guinea (PNG), concerns have been raised regarding various aspects of the proposed project. Spearheaded by foreign investors, the initiative has sparked debates over ownership, exclusivity, tax concessions, underwriting, management rights, control over currency, legal protections, and historical failures. These concerns, if unaddressed, could potentially undermine the interests of PNG and its people, particularly the hardworking alluvial miners who form the backbone of the nation's mining sector. At the heart of the issue lies the question of ownership. The proposed ownership structure, favoring foreign investors with a substantial 70% stake, raises eyebrows, especially considering PNG's past experiences with failed ventures like seabed mining. Instead of ceding majority control to foreign entities, many argue that PNG should assert full ownership over the refinery. With the coun
Read more